Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Magnet vs. Permanent Magnet: Did 1800 Physics Books Inspire Ed Leedskalnin?

Fellow experimenters, we need to stop reading Ed Leedskalnin’s Magnetic Current as a literal, step-by-step instruction manual written for the general public.

After deeply analyzing an 1847 physics text alongside several earlier treatises on magnetism and Electricity, a striking pattern emerged: there appears to be a universal, historic method of writing shared by early researchers. These texts were never meant to be blindly followed word-for-word by laymen; they were written as a cipher for fellow initiates who already understood the foundational mechanics.

Ed wasn't just inventing a wild, isolated vocabulary or theory. He was using a specific, defensive framework of writing designed to protect his core breakthroughs while leaving clear, technical breadcrumbs for those who have already built some kinda special apparatus. We will have to start translating his words through the lens of this older, hidden experimenter's code.

I am not going to attempt to decode or interpret these writings for you. Instead, I am simply going to present some of the many relations I have uncovered through my studies of these old books, leaving you to form your own conclusions and theories.









More pages to come









Sign In or Register to comment.